PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS—A QUALITATIVE STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PV263 / #331 Poster Topic: AS24 - SLE-Treatment Background/Purpose Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) requires long-term treatment with medications that carry risks of side effects and toxicities, including the risks of ocular toxicity from hydroxychloroquine, infection from oral and biologic immunosuppressants, and glucocorticoid toxicity from prednisone use. The objective of this study was to evaluate how patients approach lupus treatment decisions, including harms/benefits trade-offs with ongoing use of hydroxychloroquine and other medications for SLE. Methods We conducted a qualitative study of patients with SLE using focus groups. We identified potential study participants with a diagnosis of SLE at Massachusetts General Hospital and affiliate hospitals. We randomly selected patients for invitation to participate in virtual focus groups, with intentional oversampling of racial minority groups, males, and patients with lupus nephritis. Virtual focus groups were conducted by a physician moderator using a standardized focus group guide. Topics included key factors in patients’ decision-making process for lupus treatment decisions in general, specific factors involved in the use of hydroxychloroquine, involvement in treatment decisions, and sources of information used to make treatment decisions. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Two researchers conducted an inductive thematic analysis of the focus group transcripts through an iterative process using Dedoose. Selected themes and subthemes were independently verified by a third assessor. Results Twenty-eight individuals with SLE participated in 1 of 4 focus groups. The mean age was 47 years, and they were 89% female, 14% Black or African American, 11% Hispanic, and 21% Asian (Table 1). These participants had a range of lupus manifestations, including 39% with lupus nephritis and 32% with neurologic lupus, and the median disease duration was 9 years (IQR 6-16 years). All study participants were prior or current users of hydroxychloroquine, and the majority had used oral glucocorticoids and 1 or more oral immunosuppressants. There were 9 major themes and 18 subthemes identified along with illustrative quotes (Table 2). Patients with lupus emphasized both short-term and long-term considerations, including the priorities of avoiding short-term side effects of medications, controlling lupus disease activity, and also avoiding long-term damage from both medication toxicity and lupus itself. Preferences to avoid glucocorticoid toxicity and to maintain quality of life and physical function were also common drivers of lupus treatment decisions. The concern for future organ damage was a key factor for the decision to continue long-term hydroxychloroquine use, illustrated by a participant’s quote, “The hydroxychloroquine is like an insurance so you don’t get more damage to something else, sometimes out of a flare.” The risk of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy was the primary shared concern related to hydroxychloroquine use, but patients consistently reported that routine screening for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy provided reassurance about the safety of continuing the medication. Trust in their medical team was a key factor that supported confidence in treatment decisions. Table 1. Characteristics of Study Participants Table 2. Themes Highlighting Important Factors for Patients in Making Lupus Treatment Decisions Conclusions Patients with SLE face ongoing treatment decisions for this chronic condition, and they incorporate multiple factors to balance both the short- and long-term harms and benefits of medications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".