MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

SURVIVAL AND OUTCOMES OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS WITH PULMONARY HYPERTENSION - A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL COHORT STUDY

2025· article· en· W4410513095 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John Mathew, Kothapalli Nagamounika, Jesu Krupa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyProspective cohort studyCohort studyPulmonary hypertensionInternal medicineCohortLupus erythematosusImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV148 / #463 Poster Topic: AS17 - Miscellaneous Background/Purpose Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a severe manifestation in patients with systemic Lupus erythematous (SLE). Many treatment approaches have been suggested for SLE-PH. These treatments include vasodilatory drugs, steroids, immunosuppressive agents. There are many observational studies, case series, case reports & 1 RCT supporting the beneficial effect of cyclophosphamide in PH. However, response to other immunosuppressive agents has not been studied. This prospective observational study was planned to record survival at 24 months and treatment response in SLE-PH patients diagnosed by echocardiography to different immunosuppressive agents and vasodilators at 12 months. Methods Patients aged >18yrs with a diagnosis of SLE based on 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria & with clinical suspicion of PH are screened for PH by resting Doppler echocardiography. 22 patients with SLE-PH based on Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) of >30 mmHg were recruited from among inpatient and outpatients of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology department of Christian Medical College, Vellore from January 2021 till 2023 August. Patients with overlap connective tissue disease and pregnant females are excluded from the study. The clinical profile, antinuclear antibody, antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA), anti ribonucleoprotein (RNP)antibody, anti ds DNA antibody levels and complement levels are documented at baseline. Follow-up echo at 6,12 & 24 months were noted. They were given either IV or oral steroids followed by second line immunosuppression with either cyclophosphamide, or mycophenolate or rituximab or azathioprine and also vasodilatory therapy for PH based on clinician’s decision. Patients were assessed at 12 months to monitor treatment response in the form of improvement in clinical features, lab parameters & echocardiographic parameters. Patient’s response to treatment was documented in the following manner: Clinical improvement in - Shortness of breath – NYHA class, improvement in Resting doppler echocardiography parameters - decrease of SPAP by > 15 mmhg or > 20 % improvement from baseline or TRVmax < 2.8m/sec. The survival at 12 and 24 months is documented. Results The study included 22 patients of SLE-PH. 95.4 % (21/22) were women. At diagnosis of PH 13.64 % (3/22), did not report suggestive symptoms. SLE & PH was simultaneously diagnosed in 18.18% (4/22) patients. The mean age at diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension was 34.7 years (range 19-57 years). PH based on PASP values was severe in 45.4%, moderate in 40.9% and mild in 13.63%. 45.4% cases were in NYHA functional class III/1V & 54.5% in NYHA function class I/II. 18 patients had follow-up PASP values at 12 months, 61.1% (n=11) were treatment responders, 38.9% (n=7, 1 died) non responders. The mean decrease in PASP value in responder group was 22.84mmHg and non responder group was 0.78mmhg. No significant difference was noted in baseline characteristics, treatment modalities between the groups. One year survival was 95.4% (n=21) and 2 year survival was 80% (n=12/15). Conclusions SLE patients with PH have a high 1 and 2 year mortality in our cohort of patients. Anti U1RNP antibodies are in a high percentage of our SLE patients with PH. A higher percentage of patients had their PH responding to immunosuppression and vasodilatory therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→