MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TREATMENT PATTERNS AND OUTCOMES OF ACTHAR GEL IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: A PHYSICIAN-REPORTED CHART REVIEW

2025· article· en· W4410513118 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Priyanka P Shanbhag, Amit Patel, Kyle Hayes, Mary Panaccio, J. J. Purcell, George J. Wan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSystemic diseaseConnective tissue diseaseDermatologyLupus erythematosusImmunopathologyInternal medicineAutoimmune diseaseImmunologyDiseaseAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV271 / #799 Poster Topic: AS24 - SLE-Treatment Background/Purpose Acthar Gel is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides. Acthar Gel is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of several autoimmune disorders and medical conditions known to cause inflammation, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aims to describe the characteristics of patients with SLE treated with Acthar Gel, utilization patterns of the medication, and physicians’ assessments of its effects on patients’ health status. Methods This study was prospectively designed with a predefined protocol and statistical analysis plan. The study employed a chart review methodology, where 41 U.S. rheumatologists reviewed 56 patient charts for individuals treated with Acthar Gel for SLE within the past 24 months. Patients with known contraindications to Acthar Gel were excluded from the study. In November 2024, physicians searched patient records starting from April 1, 2022. Data included demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, prior treatments and health outcomes following Acthar Gel treatment. Results The study included 56 SLE patients with an average age of 42 years and mean BMI of 27.5 kg/m 2 . Most were female (84%) and African American (50%). Common comorbidities included chronic joint disease (34%), hyperlipidemia (34%), hypertension (34%) and arthritis/osteoarthritis (30%). Prior to Acthar Gel treatment, 63% of patients reported fair-to-poor health status, with a mean rating of 3.6 out of 5 (where 1 = excellent and 5 = poor). Frequent symptoms included joint pain (84%), rashes (68%) and fatigue (68%). Most were previously treated with antimalarial drugs (64%), corticosteroids (64%), immunosuppressive drugs (57%) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (55%). The average time since diagnosis was 4.8 years and the average duration of Acthar Gel treatment was 8 months. Most patients (91%) were dosed at 40-80 units twice per week. Physicians reported that 89% of patients experienced improved health status after Acthar Gel treatment. Improvements among these patients included overall symptoms (82%), pain (54%), fatigue (44%), reduced corticosteroid use (44%), physical function (38%) and strength (28%). Conclusions This study demonstrates that Acthar Gel is an effective treatment option for SLE. Patients experienced improvements in multiple areas such as symptoms, pain relief, fatigue, reduced corticosteroid use, physical function and strength. These findings underscore the utility of Acthar Gel in enhancing outcomes for patients with SLE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicAutoimmune Bullous Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207