MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TREAT-TO-TARGET ATTAINMENT IN PATIENTS WITH SLE FROM THE REUMA.PT SLE REGISTRY: A MULTICENTER PORTUGUESE CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF 795 PATIENTS

2025· article· en· W4410513135 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Beatriz Mendes, Carolina Mazeda, André Pinto Saraiva, Adriana Carones, Nikita Khmelinskii, Daniel Carvalho, Carlos Marques Gomes, Mariana Diz Lopes, Susana P. Silva, Sandra Sousa, Daniel Melim, Inês Almeida, F. Oliveira Pinheiro, Catarina Rua, Diogo Jesús, José António Pereira da Silva, Luís Inês

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCross-sectional studyPortugueseMulticenter studyInternal medicinePediatricsPhysical therapyPathologyRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV215 / #526 Poster Topic: AS23 - SLE-Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Background/Purpose Treat-to-target (T2T) aiming for remission, or at least low disease activity (LDA), while tapering prednisone to ≤5 mg/day is established as a pillar for management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the 2023 updated EULAR recommendations for clinical practice. The aim of our study was to investigate the attainment of the T2T goal in the SLE population from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry (Reuma.pt) and identify unmet treatment needs. Methods We performed a cross-sectional multicenter study of patients fulfilling the EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria for SLE in the Reuma.pt. The assessment was performed at the last visit occurring between June 2023 and March 2024. Disease activity and attainment of T2T were assessed with the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS).[1] Patients with no SLE-DAS scoring were excluded. Patients were classified as in remission (clinical items of SLE-DAS =0 and prednisone ≤5 mg/day), low disease activity (LDA) (SLE-DAS ≤2.48 and prednisone ≤5 mg/day) and, for those not attaining T2T, in categories of disease activity (mild: 2.08 9.90). Descriptive analysis was performed, and a comparison between the remission vs. non-remission and LDA vs. non-LDA groups was performed using Student’s t-test, Fisher’s exact test, Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate. IBM SPSS Statistics software version 27 was used. p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There were 2459 patients with SLE from 37 centers registered in Reuma.pt. Of these, 1664 (67.7%) were excluded due to: missing data on fulfillment (n=1257, 51.1%) or no fulfillment (n=83, 3.4%) of EULAR/ACR classification criteria; missing data for SLE-DAS (n=324, 13.2%). A total of 795 patients from 18 participating centers were included [89.6% female; mean age 49.9 (SD 14.2) years] (Table 1). Main cumulative SLE clinical features included: mucocutaneous (72.5%), hematological (66.7%), arthritis (63.6%), nephritis (38.9%), serositis (19.4%) and neuropsychiatric lupus (6.8%). Remission was attained by 71.3% and an additional 3.0% were in LDA, meaning that the EULAR treatment target was achieved by 74.3%. The remaining patients presented active disease (mild 20%, moderate 2.6%, severe 3%). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was prescribed to 88.3% of all patients. Patients not in LDA were more frequently treated with synthetic (69.1% vs 39.6%, p<0.001) and biologic (19.1% vs 8.5%, p<0.001) immunosuppressants. Of the patients with active SLE, 40.2% were receiving >7.5 mg/day of prednisolone-equivalent dose and 72.7% were treated with synthetic and/or biologic immunosuppressants. Table 1. Characteristics of the patients included (n=795). Conclusions This subgroup of patients with SLE registered in Reuma.pt present a high rate of attainment of the T2T, and most are treated with HCQ, in line with the EULAR recommendations. The high number of patients excluded preclude the generalization of these conclusions. This provides benchmarking indicators demonstrating high quality of care. Furthermore, unmet needs for new and improved therapies are demonstrated, with over a quarter of patients presenting active disease despite more intensive standard-of-care. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess if T2T goals are sustained over time. Optimized treatment regimens are needed to attain recommended T2T goals in many SLE patients. Improvement of registry in Reuma.pt is indispensable for a representative national appraisal. References: [1.] Jesus D. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80(12):1568-74. * Carolina Mazeda and Beatriz Mendes contributed equally and share first authorship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body InjuriesFrench-language works237,207