MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

CLINICAL ASSOCIATIONS AND OUTCOMES OF PERICARDITIS IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

2025· article· en· W4410513236 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Pankti Mehta, Fadi Kharouf, Virginia Carrizo Abarza, Qixuan Li, Laura Whittall-García, Dafna D Gladman, Zahi Touma

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePericarditisSystemic diseaseLupus erythematosusConnective tissue diseaseDermatologyIntensive care medicineImmunologyImmunopathologyInternal medicineAutoimmune diseaseDiseaseAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV219 / #613 Poster Topic: AS23 - SLE-Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Background/Purpose Pericarditis is an important feature in the classification criteria and disease activity assessments in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to study the prevalence, outcomes, and associations of pericarditis. Methods This is an observational cohort study of patients with pericarditis identified from a single-center SLE prospective database from July 1970 to Mar 2024. The diagnosis of pericarditis was based on SLEDAI-2K. The prevalence of pericarditis was determined in both inception (enrolled within 1 year of diagnosis) and prevalent cohorts. The remaining analysis focused on the inception cohort. Demographic and clinical variables were retrieved. The outcomes of pericarditis were defined as acute (resolution < 3 months), chronic (lasting ≥ 3 months), and relapsing (recurrence after complete resolution). Variables associated with pericarditis as compared to the rest of the cohort were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Factors associated with the outcome of pericarditis (acute vs. chronic, relapse vs. no relapse) were examined within the pericarditis subgroup. Results Pericarditis was identified in 428 of 2122 patients (20.16%), 205 of 900 (22.8%) in the inception, and 223 of 1222 (18.2%) in the prevalent cohorts. The median age at SLE diagnosis was 30.31 years (IQR 13.72-41.06) (Table 1). Pericarditis typically developed early in the disease course, with a median disease duration of 0.51 years (IQR 0.11-2.11) at the first event. In 170 patients, the severity of chest pain was 6.5 of 10 (IQR 4.25-8). Associated myocarditis was observed in 5.3%, endocarditis in 1.9%, and cardiac tamponade in 1.4%. SLEDAI-2K at the time of pericarditis was 6 (2-14), with commonly affected organ systems being hematologic (81%) and skin (76.1%). The majority had low complements and/or elevated anti-dsDNA (79.5%). Treatment included oral glucocorticoids (79%), and antimalarials (54.6%), with the most common immunosuppressant being azathioprine (20.9%). In comparison with patients without pericarditis, pericarditis was associated with younger age [0.98 (0.97-0.99)], higher average mean SLEDAI 2K [1.05 (1.02-1.09)], more constitutional symptoms [1.6 (1.19-2.19)], and less skin involvement [0.41 (0.27-0.62)]. The pericarditis outcomes were favorable for most, with 79.5% achieving complete resolution within 3 months. Chronic pericarditis was observed in 15.6% and lasted for 4.59 (3.3-16.78 months). Relapses occurred in 22.9% of patients, with a median of 2 relapses (IQR 2-3). No associations with age at diagnosis, anti-dsDNA, low complements, or organ involvement were found for those with chronic pericarditis and relapses. Table 1: Demographics, clinical features, and serology of the inception cohort with pericarditis. Conclusions Pericarditis was observed in 1 in 5 patients and was typically seen early in the disease course. The majority resolved within 3 months, with chronic pericarditis in 15.6%, and relapsing course in 22.9%. No associations were observed with chronic pericarditis and relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→