Complex Signaling Networks Underlying Blue-Light-Mediated Floral Transition in Plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blue light (BL) is important in regulating floral transition. In a controlled environment production system, BL can be manipulated easily and precisely in aspects like peak wavelength, intensity, duration, and co-action with other wavelengths. However, the results of previous studies about BL-mediated floral transition are inconsistent, which implies that an in-depth critical examination of the relevant physiological mechanisms is necessary. This review consolidates the recent findings on the role of BL in mediating floral transition not only in model plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, but also in crops, especially horticultural crops. The photoreceptors, floral integrator proteins, signal pathways, and key network components involved in BL-mediated floral transition are critically reviewed. This review provides possible explanations for the contrasting results of previous studies on BL-mediated flowering; it provides valuable information to explain and develop BL manipulation strategies for mediating flowering, especially in horticultural plants. The review also identifies the knowledge gaps and outlines future directions for research in related fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".