Surface Water Extent Extraction in Prairie Environments Using Sentinel-1 Image-Pair Coherence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge of surface water extent is critical for ecological and disaster monitoring. However, surface water extraction from optical satellite imagery is challenging due to the impact of weather. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) can penetrate cloud cover and has significant advantages for surface water mapping, but the classification accuracy might be limited by SAR’s inherent properties and land cover, which have similar backscatter to surface water. This study finds that the accuracy of surface water extraction at the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) can be improved by combining interferometric coherence and backscatter for machine learning classification. This study performs time-series analysis on surface water and land to investigate their discrimination at different seasonal periods. The accuracy improvement of this method on Sentinel-1 images reached 10% during the seasons of fall and winter, where the combination of backscatter and coherence was proven to be efficient for separating water and land. Hence, our approaches of combining backscatter and coherence provide new insights for surface water extraction from SAR images in future studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".