MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410522400 · doi:10.3390/children12050648

The Pharmacokinetics, Dosage, Preparation Forms, and Efficacy of Orally Administered Melatonin for Non-Organic Sleep Disorders in Autism Spectrum Disorder During Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4410522400 on OpenAlexaff
Ekkehart Paditz, Bertold Renner, Rainer Koch, Barbara Schneider, Angelika A. Schlarb, O. Ipsiroglu

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfAndrew W. Mellon Foundation
KeywordsMelatoninAutism spectrum disorderAutismMedicinePlaceboPsycINFOMEDLINEClinical trialRandomized controlled trialMeta-analysisPediatricsPsychiatryInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: To date, it remains unclear which oral doses and preparation forms of melatonin should be recommended for children and adolescents with non-organic sleep disorders and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We reviewed the current state of knowledge on this topic based on randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) and diagnosis-related blood melatonin concentrations available in this age group. Method: Two investigators independently searched PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL on 1 March 2025 for the keywords “melatonin”, “autism”, and “randomised” in titles and abstracts in all languages, including an evaluation of the references of the reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published up to that date, some of which were based on searches in numerous databases. Based on this, additional in-depth searches were carried out in PubMed for pharmacokinetic, physiological, and pathophysiological data on melatonin in children and adolescents, with a special focus on ASD. Results: To date, five RCTs on non-organic sleep disorders in children and adolescents with the sole diagnosis of ASD or with subgroup analyses in the presence of several initial diagnoses such as ADHD, epilepsy, Smith–Magenis, or Fragile X syndrome are available. In these studies, rapid-release, non-delayed preparations were administered orally. In one of these studies, the clinical efficacy of a combination preparation with a sustained-release and a non-released active substance component was tested. Pharmacokinetic data with multiple determinations of melatonin concentrations in the blood are only available for children with ASD in the form of a case series (N = 9). Discussion: RCTs comparing the efficacy of delayed melatonin preparations with non-delayed rapid-release oral preparations are not yet available. Physiological data and clinical effects documented in five RCTs indicate that non-delayed melatonin preparations with an initial rapid onset of action are effective for non-organic sleep disorders in children and adolescents with ASD. Conclusions: From a clinical, pharmacokinetic, and physiological point of view, the RCTs available to date and the data on melatonin concentrations in the blood of children with ASD, measured several times over 24 h, suggest that a low oral melatonin dose and a non-delayed preparation with rapid onset should be started in children and adolescents with non-organic sleep disorders in ASD, if sleep hygiene advice and psychotherapeutic interventions have not demonstrated sufficient effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildrenSame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207