MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410524065 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.17.25327834

Dynamics of Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States During COVID-19

2025· preprint· en· W4410524065 on OpenAlexaff
Hawre Jalal, Donald S. Burke

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Drug overdose2019-20 coronavirus outbreakDrugSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)MedicineVirologyPharmacologyMedical emergencyPoison controlInternal medicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STRUCTURED ABSTRACT Importance Drug overdose (OD) deaths in the United States have risen exponentially for four decades and surged further during the COVID 19 pandemic; the drivers of this surge remain unclear. Objective To quantify excess OD mortality during COVID 19, separate its temporal components, and identify social, economic, and drug supply factors—especially Economic Impact Payments (EIPs)—linked to those components. Design, Setting, and Participants Temporal and spatial analysis of all 50 U.S. states using OD deaths (1979–2023) merged with state level data on COVID-19, unemployment, income, mobility, fentanyl seizures, opioid treatment supply, and EIP timing/amounts. Methods A log linear model projected the 40-year exponential trend and seasonality to establish a no-COVID baseline. Pandemic era deviations were modeled with Poisson state fixed effects regressions. Five week moving window t-tests flagged synchronous mortality spikes across states, and a two-way fixed effects event study estimated the elasticity of OD deaths to EIP related income shocks. JP Morgan Chase checking balance data validated the income–mortality link. Results From MarchL2020 to May □ 2023, OD deaths exceeded baseline by 67 □ 571 (24.4%). Sustained elevation was positively associated with income (β □ ≈ □ 0.96), fentanyl seizures, unemployment, and COVID-19 case rates, and inversely with methadone distribution. Three short lived spikes aligned with EIP disbursements, raising daily deaths by up to 85 above trend. A 10% rise in relative income increased OD mortality 11%; national checking balance surges and OD deaths were tightly correlated (r □ ≈ □ 0.90). Conclusions and Relevance Pandemic era overdose deaths comprise continuing exponential growth, a COVID-19 related sustained rise tied to social disruption, and EIP linked spikes. Future relief payments should consider staggered disbursement and concurrent harm reduction measures to mitigate overdose risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment→French-language works237,207→