TMNet: Transformer-fused multimodal framework for emotion recognition via EEG and speech
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the evolving field of emotion recognition, which intersects psychology, human–computer interaction, and social robotics, there is a growing demand for more advanced and accurate frameworks. The traditional reliance on single-modal approaches has given way to a focus on multimodal emotion recognition, which offers enhanced performance by integrating multiple data sources. This paper introduces TMNet, an innovative multimodal emotion recognition framework that leverages both speech and Electroencephalography (EEG) signals to deliver superior accuracy. This framework utilizes cutting-edge technology, employing a Transformer model to effectively fuse the CNN-BiLSTM and BiGRU architectures, creating a unified multimodal representation for enhanced emotion recognition performance. By utilizing a diverse set of datasets RAVDESS, SAVEE, TESS, and CREMA-D for speech, along with EEG signals captured via the Muse headband. The multimodal model achieves impressive accuracies of 98.89% for speech and EEG signal processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it