MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410524579 · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101015

The effect of dual inflammation on the acute phase clinical outcomes of schizophrenia patients with comorbid COVID-19

2025· article· en· W4410524579 on OpenAlexaff
Jiahui Zhu, Jiamin Shao, Peng Wang, Yuan Liu, Gangming Cheng, Qi Zhou, Zhuoran Li, Mingqia Wang, Zhuokai Zhang, Xuan Dong, Chuan Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior & Immunity - Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBeijing Municipal Science and Technology CommissionNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)InflammationMedicineDual (grammatical number)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)ComorbidityIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePsychiatryVirologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and hypothesis: Inflammation plays a crucial role in pathological mechanisms in schizophrenia (SZ) and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the impact of dual inflammation on SZs' clinical outcomes is poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether dual inflammation impacts acute phase outcomes in patients with schizophrenia comorbid with COVID-19 (COVID-SZs). Study design: A total of 114 SZs and 49 COVID-SZs were recruited for this study. Plasma samples were collected and analyzed for levels of routine blood and inflammatory cytokines from all the participants. Then clinical symptoms, cognitive performance, and functional assessments were conducted at recruitment. One-way analysis of covariance examined the differences in inflammatory cytokines and correlation analyses examined the relationship between inflammatory cytokines and clinical outcomes. Study results: After controlling for age, gender, substance use status, and antipsychotic medications, levels of inflammatory cytokines increased in COVID-SZs groups compared to SZs groups. There were significantly higher total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores and positive PANSS scores in COVID-SZs groups compared to SZs. As for cognitive performance, the COVID-SZs group had significantly worse performance in processing speed and attention than the SZs. The COVID-SZs group had significantly worse health status compared to the SZs. There were significantly different correlation patterns between the severity of psychiatric symptoms and inflammatory cytokines in COVID-SZs and SZs group. Conclusions: Findings indicate that dual inflammation exacerbates the acute phase clinical outcome of COVID-SZs. Suggesting a combined anti-inflammatory drug or the use of potentially anti-inflammatory antipsychotics in the acute phase of treatment to mitigate central nervous system damage. Regular monitoring of inflammatory marker levels can help reduce the risk of fluctuating psychiatric symptoms in patients with schizophrenia caused by inflammatory storms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain Behavior & Immunity - HealthSame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207