MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410526030 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.200420

Remediation of Oil-Contaminated Soil Using Nerium oleander Extract: Mechanisms of Hydrocarbon Absorption and Removal

2025· article· en· W4410526030 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sama Hassan Ali Rahmatullah, Reyam Naji Ajmi, Estabraq Mohammed Ati, Awatif Mahfouz Abdulmajeed

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMustansiriyah UniversityUniversity of Tabuk
KeywordsEnvironmental remediationContaminationWaste managementHydrocarbonEnvironmental scienceSoil contaminationAbsorption (acoustics)Oil spillEnvironmental chemistryPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental engineeringChemistryEngineeringMaterials scienceBiologyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Findings from this study indicated the impact of hydrocarbon pollution on soil around the Dora refinery.The polluted soil contained high levels of hydrocarbons, up to 1,000 parts per million (ppm) for some soils, dominated by hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, and xylene.An asymmetrical distribution of these compounds was observed, with heavier hydrocarbons (e.g., kerosene and diesel) found in the lower soil strata, and lighter hydrocarbons (e.g., methane and ethane) in the upper layers.Aromatic hydrocarbon levels in contaminated soils were found to be 80-90% higher compared to uncontaminated samples.GC-MS analysis confirmed the presence of alkanes and aromatic compounds, including anthracene and furene, in the contaminated soils, indicating potential adverse effects on both soil and plant health.Application of Nerium oleander extract to polluted soil resulted in a significant reduction of hydrocarbons, ranging from 40% to 60% over a few weeks.Compared to untreated soil, hydrocarbon levels were reduced by approximately 50%.Heavy metal analysis revealed significantly higher concentrations in polluted soils than in uncontaminated ones, with iron (Fe) at 1000-1200 ppm, lead (Pb) at 50-70 ppm, cadmium (Cd) at 5-8 ppm, and zinc (Zn) at 150-200 ppm, indicating industrial contamination in the area.Various concentrations of Nerium oleander extract were tested, with the 10% concentration showing the most effective results-achieving a 70% hydrocarbon reduction after 14 days and up to 85% efficiency after 21 days.When compared to treatments using distilled water and ethanol, Nerium oleander extract demonstrated superior performance in hydrocarbon removal from the soil.In conclusion, the 10% oleander extract is a viable environmental treatment for removal of hydrocarbon pollution from contaminated soil and outperforms other treatments in terms of efficacy and ability to improve oil and industrial pollutioncontaminated soil quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207