The Modern Expression of Anti-War Ideology: The Multidimensional Artistic Presentation of the “Fear” Segment in Eason Chan’s “Fear and Dreams” Concert
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes the artistic presentation of the “Fear” segment in Eason Chan’s “Fear and Dreams” concert to explore the modern expression of anti-war ideology. It further integrates Ulrich Beck’s theory of risk society and Mark Fisher’s critique of capitalist realism for a deeper discussion. Ulrich Beck’s theory of risk society reveals the increasing uncertainty and risks faced by modern society in the context of globalization and technological advancement. This uncertainty is powerfully conveyed in the concert through striking stage design and lyrics, expressing anxiety and fear about the future. Mark Fisher’s critique of capitalist realism focuses on how capitalism shapes individual ideologies. The sense of fear expressed in Chan’s songs serves as a reflection and critique of this reality, revealing how individual freedom is oppressed in capitalist societies. Overall, through multidimensional artistic techniques, Eason Chan deconstructs the emotion of “Fear,” forming a modern expression of anti-war ideology that encourages the audience to deeply reflect on the mechanisms of fear and control in contemporary society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".