MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410527824 · doi:10.23952/jnva.9.2025.5.06

Generalized D-gap functions and error bound results for time-dependent variational-hemivariational inequalities

2025· article· en· W4410527824 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVisual Computing and Virtual Reality Key Laboratory of Sichuan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsApplied mathematicsInequalityUpper and lower boundsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper first introduces a novel class of generalized difference gap (D-gap) functions derived from locally Lipschitz continuous functions, aiming to equivalently transform time-dependent variational-hemivariational inequalities into unconstrained optimization formulations.Based on this, we further establish that the generalized D-gap function exhibits local Lipschitz continuity and coercivity.Finally, under the conditions of coercivity and local -monotonicity, we present local and global error bound results for the generalized D-gap function, which provides critical theoretical support for the design and analysis of optimization algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational AnalysisSame topicContact Mechanics and Variational InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207