Convergence of inertial iterative algorithms based on auxiliary principle for linearly constrained monotone equilibrium problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, inertial iterative algorithms based on auxiliary principle are proposed for solving linearly constrained monotone equilibrium problems (LCMEP) via an auxiliary principle, which is to construct an auxiliary equilibrium problem and show that a solution of the auxiliary problem is also a solution to the original problem.The convergence results of the inertial iterative algorithm are established under some mild assumptions.We obtain the worst-case convergence rate O(1/t) of the proposed algorithm in the nonergodic case.Furthermore, we propose an self-adaptive inertial iterative algorithm for solving LCMEP, which can improve the convergence rate and robustness of the non-adaptive inertial iterative algorithm and reduce the uncertainty caused by the selection of fixed inertia parameters.Some customized inertial iterative algorithms are also given by choosing special positive-definite matrix in auxiliary equilibrium problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it