MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410534041 · doi:10.1093/brain/awaf185

Neurotransmitter-informed connectivity maps and their application for outcome inference after stroke

2025· article· en· W4410534041 on OpenAlexaff
Philipp Koch, Benedikt M. Frey, Winifried Backhaus, Nora Petersen, Gabriel Girard, Paweł P. Wróbel, Hanna Braaß, Marlene Bönstrup, Lisa Kunkel genannt Bode, Bastian Cheng, Götz Thomalla, Christian Gerloff, Hannes Schacht, Peter Schramm, Georg Royl, Fanny Quandt, Robert Schulz

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversität zu LübeckGemeinnützige Hertie-Stiftung
KeywordsConnectomeConnectomicsNeurosciencePsychologyModified Rankin ScaleStroke (engine)Serotonin transporterLesionDopamine transporterMedicineDopamineDopaminergicInternal medicinePsychiatrySerotoninReceptorFunctional connectivityIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroscience has evolved by framing numerous neuropsychiatric conditions as network diseases. Alterations within neurotransmitter (NT) systems are central to the development of these diseases. Recently, normative data on whole-brain NT fingerprints derived from PET tracer data have become accessible; limited data related this information to sequelae after stroke. This work aimed to explore: (i) the integration of NT data into whole-brain structural connectivity analyses; and (ii) its potential contribution to understanding outcome variability following stroke. Normative maps of NT receptor and transporter densities were integrated with a normative structural connectome to generate NT-specific connectivity maps for serotonin, dopamine, GABA, glutamate and acetylcholine receptors and transporters. Stroke lesion data from two independent, matched cohorts comprising a total of 126 severely impaired acute stroke patients were used to assess NT-related network damage on a patient-specific basis across the distribution of each receptor and transporter. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to evaluate the relationship between NT-informed network disconnections and functional outcomes 3 to 6 months post-stroke, operationalized by the modified Rankin scale. Analyses were adjusted for lesion-induced global network damage, age, sex, lesion volume and baseline neurological symptom burden. We present an innovative method for incorporating PET tracer data on various NT systems into normative structural connectome datasets. The resulting NT-informed connectivity maps revealed distinct spatial distributions consistent with the established literature. In both cohorts of severely impaired stroke patients, incorporating lesion-induced disruptions within specific NT systems provided more insights into variability in stroke outcomes than the structural disconnection data alone. Notably, greater damage to networks with high dopamine transporter density was associated with poorer functional recovery. Based on NT-informed structural connectivity maps with distinct topographical features for individual receptors and transporters, we show that lesion-induced disruptions in large-scale dopaminergic brain networks, beyond global structural network damage, may play a key role in stroke recovery. These insights hold significant translational potential for advancing personalized medicine in stroke care, such as targeted pharmacologic interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207