PSVI-15 Impact of high zinc oxide supplementation or lignocellulose supplement on fecal microbiota of weaned piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This project aimed to study the effect of high zinc oxide (ZO) and fiber supplementation from lignocellulose (LIGCEL) on the fecal microbiota of weaned piglets. At weaning (21 days), 150 piglets (6.39 ± 0.28 kg) were transferred to a nursery farm, and divided into 30 pens of 5 piglets each according to their weaning weight. Each pen was assigned to one of the following treatments: Control (CON, 150 mg/kg of zinc), ZO (2,500 mg/kg of zinc), and LIGCEL (CON + 3% lignocellulose). fed to the animalsadministered for 14 days. In each pen, 2 to 3 fresh fecal samples were collected and pooled on day 14. The 16s RNA gene amplification and sequencing were performed at the Genomic Analysis Platform (Université Laval, Québec, Canada). Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were generated using the DADA2 pipeline, considering the SILVA rRNA database. Alpha diversity was calculated on normalized data (evenness: Shannon and Simpson). For the beta diversity, the Bray Curtis distance matrix was calculated and plotted using a Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot. The effects of diets were tested using a non-parametric PERMANOVA model, with 999 permutations. The differential abundance analysis on the different taxa was performed using Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) at family level. An LDA score of 3 was used as a cutoff value. A total of 11,083 ASVs were obtained. The ASVs were associated with 23 phyla and 107 families. The most abundant phyla were Firmicutes (71 ± 0.08%), Bacteroidota (25 ± 0.07%), and Proteobacteria (2 ± 0.04%); the most abundant families were Lachnospiraceae (30 ± 0.11%), Lactobacillaceae (26 ± 0.13%), and Prevotellaceae (20 ± 0.08%). Alpha diversity was not affected by diet. Diet significantly affected the Adonis test (R² = 0.20, P = 0.001). Piglets receiving the LIGCEL supplement were characterized by a higher abundance of Lactobacillaceae (P:adj= 0.0007, LDA:score= 5.20), Veillonellaceae (P:adj= 0.026, LDA:score= 4.38), Rikenellaceae (P:adj= 0.009, LDA:score= 3.78), Succinivibrionaceae (P:adj= 0.001, LDA:score= 3.68), and Selenomonadaceae (P:adj= 0.038, LDA:score= 3.61). CON piglets were characterized by a higher abundance of Enterobacteriaceae (P:adj= 0.046, LDA:score= 4.35), Christensenellaceae (P:adj= 0.0003, LDA:score= 4.09), and Spirochaetaceae (P:adj= 0.0003, LDA:score= 4.09). Piglets receiving the ZO diet were characterized by a higher abundance of Lachnospiraceae (P:adj= 0.0002, LDA:score= 5.11), Prevotellaceae (P:adj= 0.011, LDA:score= 4.88), Ruminococcaceae (P:adj= 0.0009, LDA:score= 4.30), Clostridiaceae (P:adj= 0.045, LDA:score= 4.00), and Butyricicoccaceae (P:adj= 0.015, LDA:score= 3.76). The addition of ZO clearly modified the fecal microbiota of piglets, highlighting families positively associated with intestinal health, as Lachnospiraceae, Prevotellaceae, and Ruminococcaceae. The lignocellulose supplement also promoted the development of favorable families, namely Lactobacillaceae and Rikenellaceae. In contrast, CON piglets were characterized by the presence of bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".