MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410536022 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf102.337

PSV-14 Antioxidant status and reproductive performance of sows supplemented with high levels of selected vitamins and trace minerals during the peri-ovulatory period

2025· article· en· W4410536022 on OpenAlexaff
Danyel Bueno Dalto, J. J. Matte, Jérôme Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Biological Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrace MineralsPeriTrace mineralPeriod (music)Animal scienceAntioxidantBiologyPhysiologyToxicologyMedicineInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present study evaluated the use of high levels of selected trace minerals and vitamins with antioxidant properties to alleviate the peri-ovulatory oxidative burst in sows and improve within-litter homogeneity. Seventy four Yorkshire-Landrace multiparous sows were used in a completely randomized arrangement with two dietary treatments: CTR: regular gestation diet or; TRT: regular gestation diet supplemented with supranutritional levels of copper, manganese, selenium, vitamins A, E, B6, and C (Table 1). Blood samples were collected eight days before the predicted oestrus (d13), the day after the onset of oestrus (d21), and five days later (d26) for the determination of plasma concentrations of retinol, pyridoxal-5-phosphate, copper, and selenium as well as protein carbonyl and 8-hydroxyguanosine (markers of oxidative stress) and the activity of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase in plasma. Sows reproductive performance (body weight, backfat depth, litter size, stillbirth, piglets birthweight, litter homogeneity) was assessed. Plasma selenium and pyridoxal-5-phosphate concentrations were similar between treatments at d13, increased significantly for TRT at d21 and decreased to CTR levels by d26 (P ≤ 0.01). No effect of treatment was detected on plasma retinol and copper concentrations (P ≥ 0.61). No effect of treatment was detected on plasma superoxide dismutase and catalase activities (P ≥ 0.52). Although not statistically different (P = 0.11), glutathione peroxidase activity increased almost 10 % from d21 to d26 in TRT sows compared to less than 3 % in the CTR group. No effect of treatment was detected on plasma protein carbonyl and 8-hydroxyguanosine concentrations (P ≥ 0.23). However, time effects were detected. Plasma copper concentrations were not different between d13 and d21 but decreased at d26 (P = 0.06) whereas plasma retinol concentrations were lowest at d13 and did not differ between d21 and d26 (P = 0.03). Plasma superoxide dismutase activity was lowest at d13, highest at d21, intermediary at d26 (P < 0.01) whereas plasma glutathione peroxidase activity was lowest at d21 and did not differ between d13 and d26 (P < 0.01) and plasma catalase activity was not different between d13 and d21 but increased at d26 (P = 0.04). Plasma protein carbonyl concentrations was highest at d13 and did not differ between d21 and d26 (P < 0.01). Plasma 8-hydroxyguanosine concentrations were not different between d13 and d21 but decreased at d26 (P = 0.01). No effect of treatment was detected on sows reproductive performance (P ≥ 0.17). In conclusion, although supplementation of trace minerals and vitamins with antioxidant properties at high dietary levels enhanced the plasma concentration of some of these nutrients, it had little impact on the modulation of the antioxidant system during the peri-ovulatory period, which apparently did not induce systemic oxidative stress multiparous sows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAgriculture and Biological StudiesFrench-language works237,207