MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of metakaolin and fly ash on the early hydration and pore structure of Portland cement

2025· article· en· W4410542488 on OpenAlexaff
Vanda Papp, I. Ardelean, Anna Bulátkó, Krisztina László, A. Csík, Róbert Janovics, Mónika Kéri

Bibliographic record

VenueCement and Concrete Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetakaolinPortland cementFly ashMaterials scienceCementComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Substituting cement with pozzolans is important for various applications, like radioactive waste management. In this study, 10–30 % metakaolin and fly ash were added to Portland cement to gain insight into their effects on the structure formation, pore structure, and surface properties of cement. Early hydration of these composites was monitored using NMR relaxometry, showing that metakaolin exhibited pozzolanic activity after 8 h, while filler effect was observed for fly ash. FFC NMR and T 1 -T 2 correlation relaxometry revealed stronger water-solid interaction for the composites compared to pure cement. The dominance of the CSH gel pores increased with the additives in dry and wet state. Water diffusion in the capillary pores, followed by H 2 O-D 2 O exchange, was slower in metakaolin composites than in fly ash containing samples. The novel combination of NMR, SEM and N 2 porosimetry showed an advantage of metakaolin additive over fly ash for the long-term safe disposal of radioactive waste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCement and Concrete ResearchSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207