WALLABY pilot survey: Spatially resolved gas scaling relations within the stellar discs of nearby galaxies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The scatter in global atomic hydrogen (Hi) scaling relations is partly attributed to differences in how Hi and stellar properties are measured, with Hi reservoirs typically extending beyond the inner regions of galaxies where star formation occurs. Using pilot observations from the Widefield ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind Survey (WALLABY), we present the first measurements of Hi mass enclosed within the stellar-dominated regions of galaxies for a statistical sample of 995 local gas-rich systems, investigating the factors driving its variation. We examine how global Hi scaling relations change when measurements are restricted to $R_{\text{25}}$ and $R_{\text{24}}$ – the isophotal radii at 25 and 24 mag arcsec $^{-2}$ in the i-band – and explore how the fraction of Hi mass and Hi surface density within these radii correlate with other galaxy properties. On average, 68% of the total Hi mass is enclosed within $R_{\text{25}}$ and 54% within $R_{\text{24}}$ , though significant variation exists between galaxies, ranging from $\sim$ 20% to 100%. The fraction of Hi mass within $R_{\text{25}}$ shows a mild correlation with stellar properties, with galaxies of higher stellar mass, greater stellar surface density, or redder colours enclosing a larger fraction of their Hi reservoirs. These correlations do not significantly strengthen when considering $R_{\text{24}}$ . Conversely, global Hi surface densities show no significant correlation with stellar mass or stellar surface density, but trends start emerging when these are measured within the inner regions of galaxies. The strongest correlation is observed with optical colour, with bluer galaxies having higher average Hi surface densities within $R_{\text{25}}$ . This trend of the average Hi surface density with optical colour strengthens when we restrict from $R_{\text{25}}$ to $R_{\text{24}}$ , suggesting a closer connection between inner Hi reservoirs and star formation. This study underscores the value of (at least marginally) resolved Hi surveys of statistical samples for advancing our understanding of the gas-star formation cycle in galaxies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".