MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410553623 · doi:10.3390/ijms26104955

RNA Modifications in Osteoarthritis: Epitranscriptomic Insights into Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Targets

2025· review· en· W4410553623 on OpenAlexafffund
Shabnam Radbakhsh, Mehdi Najar, Makram Merimi, Mohamed Benderdour, Julio Fernandes, Johanne Martel‐Pelletier, Jean‐Pierre Pelletier, Hassan Fahmi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsRNAN6-MethyladenosineRNA methylationPseudouridineNon-coding RNABiologyMethylationSmall interfering RNANucleic acid structureOsteoarthritisMessenger RNAGene expressionLong non-coding RNAGeneTransfer RNAGeneticsMedicineMethyltransferasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic joint disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of articular cartilage, pain, synovial inflammation, and bone remodeling. Post-transcriptional RNA modifications, known as epitranscriptome, are a group of biochemical alterations in the primary RNA transcript that might influence RNA structure, stability, and function. Different kinds of RNA modifications have been recognized, such as methylation, acetylation, pseudouridylation, and phosphorylation. N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), N7-methylguanosine (m7G), 2'-O-ribose methylation (2'-O-Me), and pseudouridylation (Ψ) are the most prevalent RNA modifications. Recent studies have shown that disruption in these modifications can interfere with gene expression and protein function. Here, we will review all types of RNA modifications and how they contribute to the onset and progression of OA. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review comprehensively addressing all epitranscriptomic modifications in OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207