MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410558613 · doi:10.5194/icuc12-186

Urban-scale modeling of building energy self-sufficiency using rooftop photovoltaics 

2025· preprint· en· W4410558613 on OpenAlexaffabout
Saeed Rayegan, Liangzhu Wang, Radu Zmeureanu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaicsScale (ratio)Environmental scienceArchitectural engineeringScale modelPhotovoltaic systemEngineering physicsGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineeringCartographyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Buildings are major contributors to global energy-related CO2 emissions, accounting for a significant share of global climate impacts. This has highlighted the critical need to transition toward a carbon-neutral building stock by 2050. Rooftop photovoltaics (PVs) offer substantial potential to reduce energy demand and enhance urban energy self-sufficiency. This work focuses on developing an improved CityBEM framework, an in-house urban building energy model (UBEM), to evaluate the role of rooftop PV systems in decarbonizing urban energy systems. The enhanced methodology enables city-scale, high spatiotemporal resolution simulations of both building energy use and rooftop PV retrofitting while addressing key computational and data limitations commonly faced in UBEM applications.CityBEM’s robust and scalable approach allows for transient simulations of individual buildings with diverse usage types, making it applicable to large urban areas. The rooftop PV module incorporates physics-based modeling, validation, and optimized designs to account for self-shading effects and maximize energy generation potential.Currently, the tool is being applied to model the entire city of Montreal. The goal is to generate high spatiotemporal resolution simulations of energy demand and on-site electricity generation from rooftop PVs. This framework aims to provide actionable insights into the role of rooftop photovoltaics in achieving cleaner, energy self-sufficient cities and informing strategies for large-scale urban retrofitting and decarbonization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→