Inventory Management System Using Reinforcement Learning: A Case Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research intends to put RL methods related to SCM to use in the management of input stocks.Estimating the composition of a small retailer's inventory system, specifically to recharge Coke sales, the research aims to improve the forecast of merchandise, when they should be refilled, to fulfill client expectations.The deep Q network (DQN) algorithm is used to represent the objective of the study comparing the performance of the RL-based inventory control strategy with the classic static control method ((s, S) inventory control) in a numerical test.These financial parameters are determined along with other operational constraints, such as inventory capacity, lead time, and product order costs.The demand patterns between weekdays and weekends form the basis for the simulation of historical desire data to train DQN model.The comparison of RL-based methods in the retail industry supply chain is covered by this study monetarily.Consequentially, the study introduces RLbased methods as one of the techniques in the area of improvement of retail inventory management practical applications with real-life supply chain examples to complement and prove their success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it