MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410562759 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01980-6

Decadal hydroclimatic changes in the Pantanal, the world’s largest tropical wetland

2025· article· en· W4410562759 on OpenAlexaff
Cassia Brocca Caballero, Trent Biggs, Noemi Vergopolan, Luana G.G. Camelo, Bruno Comini de Andrade, Leonardo Laipelt, Anderson Ruhoff

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorAgência Nacional de ÁguasNational Science Foundation
KeywordsWetlandTropical climateGeographyClimatologyTropicsEnvironmental scienceEcologyPhysical geographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pantanal, the world's largest tropical wetland, experienced unusual drying in 2000-2021, but the causes are poorly understood. Combining remotely sensed data of wetland extent and land cover with observed water level discharge and meteorological data, we quantify the relative contributions of climate and land use to changes in Pantanal wetland extent. Climate variability drove 96% of the runoff changes over four major hydroclimate regimes, including two wet (1951-1964; 1976-2000) and two dry (1965-1975; 2001-2021) periods. Reduced precipitation, runoff, and wetland shrinkage observed in 2001-2021 resembled the previous dry period (1965-1975), indicating decadal climatic variability. However, the higher aridity index in the recent period exacerbated the duration of the drought, and the rainfall-runoff relationship shifted over time, with more runoff for a given rainfall amount in recent periods. Wetland area is highly sensitive to climate variability, contracting to 25% of the maximum during dry years. Future warming and reduced rainfall will likely continue the recent drying trend, further reducing runoff, wetland area, and the Pantanal biodiversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→