MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Blended Learning and International Partnerships: Enhancing Education for a Globalised Future

2025· article· en· W4410564996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlended learningEngineering ethicsMathematics educationSociologyPedagogyPsychologyEngineeringEducational technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we explore the transformative potential of blended teaching and learning and international short-term study trips, emphasising their role in fostering student engagement and preparing learners for global challenges in an interconnected world.By integrating traditional methods with digital technologies, blended learning creates dynamic educational environments that address diverse learner needs while promoting collaboration and autonomy.The paper highlights the added value of short-term faculty-led study trips, which provide immersive, real-world experiences, enhancing cultural competence and interdisciplinary learning.Based on a literature review, the paper identifies strategies for combining blended learning with international educational programmes.These include leveraging interactive digital tools, fostering learner-centric environments, and employing diverse assessment methods to promote critical thinking and adaptability.Technology integration emerges as a cornerstone of this model, enabling accessible, flexible, and engaging learning experiences.However, the digital divide, financial barriers, and institutional coordination require strategic attention.The case study of the Irish-Canadian academic partnership between Atlantic Technological University (ATU) and Niagara College (NC) illustrates the practical implementation of these approaches.Initiatives like the "Spaces, Places, and Relationships for Learning, Wellbeing, and Collaboration" (SPRLWC) module demonstrate how blended learning and cross-border collaborations can deliver meaningful educational outcomes.The paper concludes with recommendations for addressing operational and logistical challenges, emphasising inclusivity, financial sustainability, and cultural integration.It advocates for continued innovation and collaboration to refine and expand blended learning and international educational programmes, ensuring they remain impactful and accessible in a rapidly evolving global landscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it