MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410567410 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99482-y

Compact wideband and high gain horn slot antenna array fed by printed ridge gap waveguide for X band applications

2025· article· en· W4410567410 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahboubeh Taraji, Elham Baladi, Marco A. Antoniades

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationCMC Microsystems
KeywordsWidebandFrench hornHigh-gain antennaHorn antennaRidgeAntenna (radio)Computer scienceSlot antennaOptoelectronicsAcousticsOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsDirectional antennaGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design and implementation of a wideband low-loss H-plane horn slot antenna array excited by a 2-by-2 bottom-fed planar corporate feeding network is presented in this paper. The feeding network is presented by a 2-by-2 symmetric power dividing system designed to feed a 2-by-2 slot antenna array from bottom. The feeding network is realized using printed ridge gap waveguide technology as a magnetic ground, to suppress surface wave propagation and to enable quasi-TEM wave propagation along the microstrip feed. Each of the power-divider branches in the feeding network excites a slot, while maintaining the impedance bandwidth of the original unloaded power divider. The feeding mechanism and H-plane horn elements help to control the sidelobe levels and increase the overall gain. The measured results are in good agreement with the simulations, with an impedance bandwidth of over 58.5%, covering the entire X-band, with a peak gain of 14.1 dBi at 10 GHz, and a measured radiation efficiency greater than 86% throughout the operating frequency range, with a peak of 99% at 10 GHz. These are significant improvements compared to an impedance bandwidth of less than 25% and a gain of 11 dBi for the antenna array without the horn elements. The antenna has a compact size of [Formula: see text] or 1.6[Formula: see text]1.6[Formula: see text]0.5[Formula: see text] at 10 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207