Elevated Trimethylamine‐N‐oxide (TMAO) Is Associated with Vascular Access Dysfunction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Elevated levels of trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), a metabolite produced by gut microbiota, have been associated with cardiovascular diseases and complications in various populations. However, its role in vascular access dysfunction in hemodialysis patients remains underexplored. This study investigates the potential relationship between TMAO levels and vascular access dysfunction in maintenance hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This study included 80 hemodialysis patients. The baseline serum TMAO levels were measured, and clinical characteristics and dialysis-related data were collected. They were followed up on vascular access dysfunction events over a period of 1 year. The association between serum TMAO levels and vascular access dysfunction events were investigated. FINDINGS: In our cohort, we observed a wide distribution of serum concentrations, with a median concentration of 15.2 μmol/L and a maximum concentration of 245.3 μmol/L. Patients were stratified into a low-TMAO group and a high-TMAO group according to the median value of TMAO concentrations. Those in the high-TMAO group had a significantly higher incidence of vascular access dysfunction events (p = 0.023). TMAO was independently associated with vascular access dysfunction events after adjusting for some potential vascular access dysfunction risk factors. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that elevated serum TMAO levels may serve as an independent risk factor for vascular access dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. Reducing TMAO levels may potentially decrease the incidence of vascular access dysfunction, warranting further investigation into this therapeutic approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".