MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410571504 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1568469

Primary succession of microbial communities in an aquifer from the Covey Hill formation in Quebec, Canada

2025· article· en· W4410571504 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Samuel Beauregard-Tousignant, Cassandre Sara Lazar

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsBureau de Coopération InteruniversitaireUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesGroupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologieNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsEcological successionPrimary successionEcologyGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquifers in the continental subsurface have long been exploited for their resources. However, given the technical difficulties in accessing recurring subsurface samples, their community diversity and temporal dynamics remain largely misunderstood. Here, we investigated the effects of time and organic and inorganic carbon concentration variation on primary succession of microbial communities belonging to the Bacteria and Eukaryote domains colonizing rock surfaces and groundwater from a shallow fractured sandstone aquifer with a very high concentration of organic carbon and low concentration of nitrogen compounds. We attempted to recreate its physicochemical environment in a triplicate bioreactor setup and let the communities grow for 24 days. The sessile and planktonic communities were sampled daily in independent experiments and identified based on their 16S (Bacteria) or 18S (Eukaryote) rRNA genes. Time was the parameter with the strongest correlation both with alpha and beta diversity. The primary succession of all communities seems to have been divided into two temporal phases: in the first phase, approximately the two 1st days, the variations in community composition and diversity were high. In the second phase, the variation is more progressive and lasted until the end of the experiment. As expected in an aquifer rich in organic carbon, bacteria were mostly heterotrophs, except in the first few days where there were some chemolithotrophs, and eukaryotes were heterotrophs or likely mixotrophs. Unexpectedly, the alpha diversity of the sessile and planktonic communities varied following similar patterns, but the planktonic ones varied with a wider amplitude. Regarding carbon's effect, organic and inorganic carbon concentration variation explained a much smaller proportion of the variation in alpha and beta diversity than expected. We believe this is due to its high concentration throughout the incubation and to the strong limiting effect of other factors such as nitrogen concentration and pH. The communities of both Bacteria and Eukaryotes were more active than expected and their temporal dynamics and interactions should be further investigated in varying carbon, nitrogen and other nutrient concentrations to better understand how different perturbations can affect subsurface communities and, subsequently, us.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Microbiology→Same topicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology→French-language works237,207→