MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410574010 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323762

Barriers hindering attendance and adherence to antenatal care visits among women in rural areas in Rwanda: An exploratory qualitative study

2025· article· en· W4410574010 on OpenAlexaff
Olive Tengera, Pamela Meharry, Aimable Nkurunziza, Yolanda Babenko‐Mould, Joselyne Rugema, Stephen Rulisa, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisQualitative researchAttendanceMedicineContext (archaeology)NursingHealth careFamily medicineHealth facilityExploratory researchPsychologyPopulationEnvironmental healthHealth services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Antenatal care (ANC) improves maternal and neonatal health. However, less than half of pregnant women in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, including Rwanda, attend adequate ANC designed to provide routine care and detect and treat early pregnancy complications. This article explores the women's views on factors that hinder adherence to ANC visits in Rwanda. METHODS: This exploratory qualitative research used in-depth interviews to collect data from 22 pregnant women. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: A Thematic analysis revealed four themes: a) stigma dynamics, b) sociocultural beliefs and practices, c) lack of partner's support, and d) Challenges to and at the healthcare setting. Unintended pregnancies, multiparity, and early weaning were identified as reasons why participants delayed attending the ANC. Sociocultural practices and beliefs that place women at the center of domestic chores, cultural misbeliefs, the influence of intergenerational behaviours, and social context were also reported as barriers to attending or adhering to ANC visits. The lack of partner support has been reported as a barrier due to existing family conflicts, domestic violence, competing personal priorities of partners over ANC, and fear of partners of HIV tests. They reported several structural barriers, including attendance and adherence to ANC visits, mandatory requirements before receiving ANC, long distance to the health facility, scattered health services within a health facility, long wait times, and negative attitudes and actions of healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: The identified factors hindering pregnant women's participation in ANC visits are modifiable in progressive countries such as Rwanda. Continued National support could reduce these barriers, increase ANC attendance, and meet the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→