MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410574440 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322453

Mapping socio-environmentally vulnerable hotspots in the Volta Delta of Ghana

2025· article· en· W4410574440 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fiifi Amoako Johnson, Philip‐Neri Jayson‐Quashigah, Duncan Hornby, Chris Hill, Mumuni Abu, Kwasi Appeaning Addo, Benjamin Kofi Nyarko, Samuel Nii Ardey Codjoe, Cynthia Addoquaye Tagoe, Craig W. Hutton, Sabu S. Padmadas

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicClimate change impacts on agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of GhanaInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsGeographyAdaptive capacityVulnerability (computing)Climate changeGeospatial analysisEnvironmental resource managementDeltaEnvironmental planningStakeholderVulnerability assessmentLand useSocioeconomicsEnvironmental protectionPsychological resilienceCartographyEcologyPolitical scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Many Delta residents are dependent on climate-sensitive resources for their survival. Nonetheless, these resources are susceptible to climatic change and variability. The Volta delta of Ghana is severely impacted by sea-level rise resulting in flooding, salinisation and permanent loss of lands, with relentless social and economic consequences. However, vulnerability assessments in the Volta Delta have primarily focused on sea level rise, with limited attention to communities' susceptibility to adverse socio-environmental impacts. This study maps socio-environmentally vulnerable hotspots in the Volta Delta, employing methods incorporating residents, stakeholders and experts' opinions. METHODS: Vulnerability is conceptualised based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) climate risk and socioeconomic vulnerability framework. The framework defines vulnerability as a function of sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Through stakeholder engagements, community support systems sensitive to climate-driven stressors, referred to as sensitivity dimensions, were identified. Those that enhance local communities' ability to adjust and mitigate the impacts of climate stressors, termed adaptive capacity dimensions, were also identified. Indicators for quantifying the dimensions were also identified through stakeholder engagements. Data for the analysis were extracted from multiple sources including Census, Landsat imagery, national land surveillance and Google Earth. Geospatial statistical techniques were used to analyse and map socio-environmental vulnerability hotspots. RESULTS: The findings show that vulnerable communities were predominantly agrarian communities clustered along the intersections of the South Tongu, North Tongu, and Akatsi districts as well as the Dangbe West and North Tongu districts. Communities along the eastern coastline of Keta and Ketu South Municipalities and the Dangbe West District were the least vulnerable. The results also show, that although communities along the coastal lines of the Keta, Ada East and Ada West districts were highly vulnerable to sea-level rise, access to vibrant cross-country economic and industrial activities at the Ghana-Togo border and the capital city of Accra and the port city of Tema contribute to their low socio-environmental vulnerability. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic ability, particularly access to alternative economic activities has the potential to mitigate vulnerability to environmental stressors. The findings direct the need for area-specific targeted and concerted interventions for strengthening the socioeconomic ability and adaptation capacity of the Volta Delta residents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicClimate change impacts on agricultureFrench-language works237,207