MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410575328 · doi:10.61838/kman.intjssh.8.2.3

A Qualitative Analysis of the Role of Sleep Disorders in Sports Injuries Among Competitive Athletes in Canada

2025· article· en· W4410575328 on OpenAlexaffabout
Virginia Longo, Daniela Gottschlich, Sarah Turner, Haixin Qiu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of Sport Studies for Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesCompetitive athletesPsychologySports injurySleep (system call)MedicinePhysical therapyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study aimed to explore how competitive athletes in Canada understand, experience, and cope with sleep-related challenges in relation to their injury histories. Methods: Using a qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 athletes aged 19 to 34, representing both individual and team sports. All participants had experienced at least one sports injury and reported issues with sleep. The interviews were analyzed in three stages—open, axial, and selective coding—allowing us to move from detailed personal accounts to broader thematic insights. Results: The analysis identified four interrelated themes. Disrupted Sleep Patterns captured athletes’ difficulties with initiating and maintaining sleep, commonly linked to stress, physical tension, and pre-sleep screen use. Emotional Burden of Sleep Loss highlighted the psychological toll of sleep disturbances, including heightened anxiety, irritability, and feelings of shame—particularly when performance declined. Heightened Injury Susceptibility reflected athletes’ perceptions that inadequate sleep contributed to greater injury risk and prolonged recovery. Finally, Systemic Barriers and Ineffective Coping pointed to a lack of institutional sleep education, cultural stigma surrounding rest, and reliance on unhelpful self-management strategies, which often compounded the problem. Conclusion: Sleep issues in elite athletes are not just about feeling exhausted—they reach into deeper layers of well-being. Poor sleep affects not only how athletes perform, but also how they feel, recover, and even how they define themselves. Hearing these experiences directly from athletes themselves reveals an urgent need for more compassionate and informed support systems—ones that include meaningful sleep education, accessible mental health care, and a cultural shift in sports that values rest and recovery just as much as effort and endurance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0200.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of Sport Studies for HealthSame topicSports Performance and TrainingFrench-language works237,207