Population-level impact of mass drug administration against schistosomiasis with anthelmintic drugs targeting juvenile schistosomes: a modelling study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is a neglected disease caused by parasitic flatworms of the genus Schistosoma and affects more than 150 million people worldwide. Praziquantel, the drug used in public health control programmes, has minimal activity against juvenile schistosomes (within 6 weeks of infection) and imperfect cure rates. We aimed to model the population-level impact of hypothetical novel drug candidates, targeting both juvenile and adult schistosomes with various efficacies, across a range of baseline epidemiological settings. METHODS: In this modelling study, we used a stochastic, individual-based mechanistic model of Schistosoma mansoni infection and simulated mass drug administration control programmes in diverse epidemiological environments. These programmes involved the administration, over a 5-year period at 75% coverage, of praziquantel (single-dose or two-dose regimens) or hypothetical novel drugs with various assumed efficacies against adult and juvenile schistosome parasites: novel drug A, with equivalent efficacy to praziquantel against adult schistosomes plus perfect (100%) efficacy against juvenile schistosomes; novel drug B, with higher efficacy than praziquantel against adult schistosomes and no activity against juveniles; and novel drug C, with higher efficacy than praziquantel against adult schistosomes plus perfect efficacy against juveniles. The outcomes were median observed S mansoni infection prevalence and infection intensity over time in simulated populations. FINDINGS: In a simulated high-endemicity setting (baseline prevalence of S mansoni infection of 53%), modelled prevalence after a single treatment was 20·8% (uncertainty interval 15·8-23·6) for single-dose praziquantel, 17·8% (15·2-19·8) for two-dose praziquantel, 18·4% (13·4-21·4) for novel drug A, 16·0% (15·0-16·8) for novel drug B, and 13·4% (12·6-14·0) for novel drug C; at year 5, modelled prevalence was 14·6% (12·2-16·4) for single-dose praziquantel, 13·6% (11·6-14·6) for two-dose praziquantel, 11·8% (9·4-13·4) for novel drug A, 12·6% (11·6-13·4) for novel drug B, and 9·6% (9·0-10·4) for novel drug C. In a simulated low-endemicity setting (baseline prevalence 15%), modelled prevalence after a single treatment was 4·8% (3·6-5·8) for single-dose praziquantel, 4·2% (3·6-5·0) for two-dose praziquantel, 4·6% (3·2-5·4) for novel drug A, 4·0% (3·4-4·6) for novel drug B, and 3·6% (3·2-4·2) for novel drug C; at year 5, modelled prevalence was 3·0% (2·2-3·6) for single-dose praziquantel, 2·8% (2·2-3·4) for two-dose praziquantel, 2·6% (1·8-3·2) for novel drug A, 2·7% (2·2-3·2) for novel drug B, and 2·2% (1·8-2·6) for novel drug C. INTERPRETATION: This study provides policy-relevant data that could help to guide the development and selection of novel drugs for schistosomiasis. Novel anthelmintic drugs that can kill both adult and juvenile schistosomes with higher efficacy than praziquantel could have some public health gains in control programmes for schistosomiasis, especially in high-burden settings. Novel drugs with increased efficacy against adult schistosomes are likely to have an initial and larger impact on disease control, whereas targeting juveniles could moderately improve longer-term control outcomes. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it