Entre uma educação libertadora e práticas neoliberais educativas: revisão sobre a categoria Projeto de Vida
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo analisa a inclusão da categoria "projeto de vida" na Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC) sob a perspectiva do avanço das práticas neoliberais na educação brasileira. Nesse sentido busca-se, a partir de uma concepção de educação libertadora, analisar o modo como a educação pode ser compreendida dentro de seus limites teóricos e subversivos ao sistema. A pesquisa utiliza análise bibliográfica e documental, centrando-se na BNCC e na Lei nº 13.415/2017, além de compreender esse corpus em seus respectivos contextos sócio-políticos, tendo na categoria projeto de vida seu principal objeto de estudo. Esta análise utiliza os conceitos Neoliberalismo e Práticas Neoliberais de Dardot e Laval (2016) e da educação libertadora de Freire (1996), como principais ferramentas analíticas, possibilitando a compreensão da realidade fenomenologicamente constituída. Em sequência, busca-se traçar caminhos viáveis para construção das aulas de projeto de vida com vistas à tentativa de subversão ao sistema neoliberal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".