MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410581443 · doi:10.2196/64592

Prediction of Spontaneous Breathing Trial Outcome in Critically Ill-Ventilated Patients Using Deep Learning: Development and Verification Study

2025· article· en· W4410581443 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hui-Chiao Yang, Angelica Te-Hui Hao, Shih-Chia Liu, Yao‐Te Tsai, Shao-Jen Weng, Ming-Cheng Chan, Chen-Yu Wang, Yeong-Yuh Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceDeep learningConvolutional neural networkMachine learningIntensive careIntensive care unitMedicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Long-term ventilator-dependent patients often face problems such as decreased quality of life, increased mortality, and increased medical costs. Respiratory therapists must perform complex and time-consuming ventilator weaning assessments, which typically take 48-72 hours. Traditional disengagement methods rely on manual evaluation and are susceptible to subjectivity, human errors, and low efficiency. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence-based prediction model to predict whether a patient can successfully pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) using the patient's clinical data collected before SBT initiation. Instead of comparing different SBT strategies or analyzing their impact on extubation success, this study focused on establishing a data-driven approach under a fixed SBT strategy to provide an objective and efficient assessment tool. Through this model, we aim to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of ventilator weaning assessments, reduce unnecessary SBT attempts, optimize intensive care unit resource usage, and ultimately improve the quality of care for ventilator-dependent patients. METHODS: This study used a retrospective cohort study and developed a novel deep learning architecture, hybrid CNN-MLP (convolutional neural network-multilayer perceptron), for analysis. Unlike the traditional CNN-MLP classification method, hybrid CNN-MLP performs feature learning and fusion by interleaving CNN and MLP layers so that data features can be extracted and integrated at different levels, thereby improving the flexibility and prediction accuracy of the model. The study participants were patients aged 20 years or older hospitalized in the intensive care unit of a medical center in central Taiwan between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. A total of 3686 patients were included in the study, and 6536 pre-SBT clinical records were collected before each SBT of these patients, of which 3268 passed the SBT and 3268 failed. RESULTS: -score of 0.875. These results confirm the reliability of the model and its potential for clinical application. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully developed a deep learning-based SBT prediction model that can be used as an objective and efficient ventilator weaning assessment tool. The model's performance shows that it can be integrated into clinical workflow, improve the quality of patient care, and reduce ventilator dependence, which is an important step in improving the effectiveness of respiratory therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207