T-COMS: A Time-Slot-Aware and Cost-Effective Data Transfer Method for Geo-Distributed Data Centers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasing demands placed on geographically distributed Data Centers (DCs), recent studies have focused on optimizing performance from the perspective of both cloud providers and customers. These studies address a variety of goals, such as minimizing transmission time, reducing resource usage, and optimizing network costs. However, many existing models for workload transfers operate using a uniform time-slot approach, which limits their flexibility in handling variable data transfer requests with different deadline requirements. This lack of adaptability can negatively impact the quality of service for users. Additionally, these models often overlook the potential benefits of incorporating multiple data sources, which can lead to sub-optimal transmission times. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduces TCOMS, a Time-slot-aware, COst-effective, and Multi-Source-aware method for file transfers tailored specifically for geo-distributed DCs, leveraging a multi-source and dynamic time-slot strategy to accelerate transmission and enhance service quality. The proposed model identifies the optimal sources, paths, and time slot lengths required to efficiently transmit workloads to their destinations while minimizing costs. Initially, we introduced a Mixed Integer NonLinear Programming (MINLP) model and subsequently linearized it within our framework. Given the NP-hard nature of the proposed model, its applicability is limited in large-scale environments. To address this issue, we developed an efficient heuristic algorithm that can derive near-optimal solutions in polynomial time. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed TCOMS model and the heuristic algorithm in terms of the reduction in cost and transmission time for file transfers between geographically distributed DCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".