IADL for identifying cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults: insights from cross-lagged panel network analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As China has entered an aging society, the prevention of cognitive impairment is of great importance. The progression of cognitive impairment is usually a slow and continuous process, with Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) serving as a sensitive indicator for early prediction of cognitive decline. The objective of this study was to utilize longitudinal network analysis to pinpoint the most sensitive indicators of IADLs to identify cognitive impairment in different populations, and to offer practical recommendations for preventing cognitive impairment among older adults in China. METHODS: A total of 2,781 participants were selected from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS 2014-2018). Cognitive function and IADLs were assessed by Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Chinese modified Lawton scale, respectively. In this study, the cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) model was employed to construct three separate networks for all Chinese older adults, male Chinese older adults, and female Chinese older adults, respectively. Two centrality indices were used to quantify symptom centrality in directed CLPN: In-Expected-Influence (IEI) and Out-Expected-Influence (OEI). RESULTS: In the IADLs and cognitive function networks, "Use public transit," "Make food" and "Walk 1 km" emerged as the most influential and important indicators. The edge "Use public transit → Attention and Calculation" was the strongest edge connection in all three networks. Among older adult males, "General ability" exhibited the most influence on other cognitive domains, followed by "Language," while "Attention and Calculation" had a weaker influence. Conversely, among older adult females, "Attention and Calculation" was the most influential factor, followed by "General ability" and "Language." CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insights into the associations between specific IADL activities and cognitive function domains among Chinese older adults. Concentrate on monitoring limitations related to "Use public transit," "Make food" and "Walk 1 km," and promoting broader life-space mobility may be beneficial to preventing the decline of cognitive function. The findings underscore the importance of targeting interventions not only by specific cognitive domains, but also potentially by gender. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".