MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410587898 · doi:10.3390/nu17111747

Associations of Multimarkers of Metabolic Malnutrition and Inflammation with All-Cause Mortality by Multimorbidity Status

2025· article· en· W4410587898 on OpenAlexaff
Setor K. Kunutsor, Reyhaneh Rikhtehgaran, Margery A. Connelly, Irina Shalaurova, Stephan J. L. Bakker, Robin P. F. Dullaart

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrients · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNierstichtingUniversitair Medisch Centrum GroningenHartstichting
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioInternal medicineConfidence intervalGastroenterologyMalnutritionBiomarkerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: The metabolic vulnerability index (MVX)—a composite biomarker reflecting metabolic malnutrition and inflammation—is associated with increased mortality risk, but its association across different levels of chronic disease burden has not been explored. We aimed to examine the associations of MVX and its subcomponents (Inflammation Vulnerability Index, IVX and Metabolic Malnutrition Index, MMX) with all-cause mortality according to multimorbidity status. Methods: In the PREVEND study, which included 6054 participants (mean age 54 years; 49.5% male), MVX was calculated using six plasma biomarkers measured simultaneously via nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Results: During a median follow-up of 14.0 years, 911 deaths were recorded. In analyses adjusted for several established risk factors, the HRs (95% CIs) of mortality per 1 standard deviation increment in MVX were 1.32 (1.13–1.54; p < 0.001), 1.23 (1.08–1.40; p = 0.002), and 1.29 (1.16–1.43; p < 0.001) for individuals with no disease, one disease, and multimorbidity, respectively. The corresponding HRs (95% CIs) were 1.22 (1.05–1.42; p = 0.010), 1.17 (1.03–1.34; p = 0.015), and 1.25 (1.13–1.38; p < 0.001) for IVX and 1.29 (1.11–1.48; p = 0.001), 1.16 (1.02–1.31; p = 0.032), and 1.14 (1.03–1.25; p = 0.004) for MMX. The ratio of HRs showed no statistical evidence that sex modified the associations of MVX, IVX, and MMX with mortality in each multimorbidity category. However, the associations appeared stronger in males with chronic disease and in females without chronic conditions, suggesting possible sex-related trends. Conclusions: MVX, IVX, and MMX are independent risk indicators of all-cause mortality regardless of the burden of chronic disease, with MVX showing the strongest associations across different multimorbidity statuses. MMX should be interpreted as a proxy for metabolic malnutrition rather than a direct nutritional assessment tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrientsSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207