MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rude Citizenship: Jamaican Popular Music, Copyright and the Reverberations of Colonial Power

2025· article· en· W4410588661 on OpenAlexaff
Jada Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueIASPM Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismCitizenshipPower (physics)Popular musicHistoryLiteratureArtSociologyGender studiesPolitical scienceLawArchaeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jamaican Popular Music, Copyright, and the Reverberations of Colonial Power delves into the intersection of law, technology, and music creation to offer a critical examination of the lingering effects of colonially derived laws -in this case, copyright -that work in opposition to modes of music-making indigenous to Jamaican culture and identity.Central to this book is the idea of "the original" -a concept that within copyright law signals notions of "originality" and is linked to authorship.In the opening paragraphs of the book, Mann relays a story in which Jamaican producer, Skatta, criticizes vocalist Tanto Blacks for using a backing track of his own creation, stating "I wish he use a more original riddim, not one that they make themselves.… Use one more established riddim that been tested!"(p. 1).Unpacking Skatta's use of this term "original", Mann notes how it departs from colonial notions of original (and, by extension, legalities of authorship, and copyright), and points instead to reuse as a normative creative practice in Jamaican musical culture.Original, Mann states,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.017
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIASPM JournalSame topicCaribbean history, culture, and politicsFrench-language works237,207