LiveVV: Human-Centered Live Volumetric Video Streaming System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Volumetric video (VV) has emerged as a prominent medium within the realm of extended reality (XR) with advancements in computer graphics and depth capture hardware. Users can fully immersive themselves in VV with the ability to switch their viewport in six degree of freedom (DOF), including three rotational dimensions (yaw, pitch, and roll) and three translational dimensions (X, Y, and Z). Different from traditional 2-D videos that are composed of pixel matrices, VVs employ point clouds, meshes, or voxels to represent a volumetric scene, resulting in significantly larger data sizes. While previous works have successfully achieved VV streaming in video-on-demand scenarios, the live streaming of VV remains an unresolved challenge due to the limited network bandwidth and stringent latency constraints. In this article, we proposeLiveVV, a holistic live VV streaming system that integrates multiview capture, scene segmentation and reuse, adaptive transmission, and real-time rendering.LiveVVfeatures lightweight VV capture modules for easy deployment, processes static and dynamic content separately to reduce bandwidth consumption, and incorporates a VV adaptive bitrate streaming algorithm (VABR) to ensure fluent playback with high-quality experience. Real-world implementation and evaluation demonstrate thatLiveVVachieves live VV streaming at 24 FPS frame rate with less than 350-ms latency on average, meeting the requirements of real-life application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".