MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410593562 · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127270

Comparative study of humoral and cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2 induced by different COVID-19 vaccine types: Insights into protection against wildtype, Delta and JN.1 omicron strains

2025· article· en· W4410593562 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Hasan, Kiran Iqbal Masood, Shama Qaiser, Akbar Kanji, Fridah Mwenda, Marta Alenquer, Junaid Iqbal, Filipe Ferreira, Yaqub Wassan, Sadaf Balouch, Maliha Yameen, Shahneel Hussain, Kehkashan Begum, Khalid Feroz, Sajid Muhammad, Ayesha Sadiqa, Mishgan Akhtar, Atif Habib, Syed Muhammad Areeb Ahmed, Afsar Mian, Rabia Hussain, Maria João Amorim, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Bibliographic record

VenueVaccine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
FundersHigher Education Commission, PakistanUniversity Research Council, Aga Khan University
KeywordsVirologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Biology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakHumoral immunityImmunityImmunologyMicrobiologyImmune systemMedicineOutbreakDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the effectiveness of different COVID-19 vaccinations administered in Pakistan by studying the effect of inactivated virus, mRNA and vector formulations. This study in 916 participants was conducted between October 2021 and July 2022. Subjects receiving inactivated (A), mRNA (B), one-dose vector (C), and two-dose vector (D) vaccines were sampled at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Serum IgG antibodies to wildtype Spike and its receptor binding domain (RBD) were measured. Pseudovirus particle-based neutralizing assays against wildtype, Delta, and JN.1 variants were performed. T cell IFN-γ responses to SARS-CoV-2 antigens were measured. Participants were aged 37.05 ± 14.44 years and comprised 48.6 % females. Baseline Spike seropositivity rose from 90 % to 96 % by 24 weeks; and 40 % to 90 % against RBD. Group B participants had the highest anti-RBD levels which peaked by 6 weeks. IgG RBD in group A and C increased up until 24 weeks. Anti-RBD levels were reduced in those over 50 years. At baseline neutralizing titers were present at 38.5 % against wildtype and in 34.2 % against Delta variants. Titers doubled in vaccine groups A-C by 12 weeks, with highest titers in B and lowest in group C participants. At baseline, neutralizing titers against the JN.1 variant were absent but low titers were evident in 10 % of participants after 12 weeks. T cell reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 increased from 31 % at baseline to 50 % in group A and 73 % in group B participants by 6 weeks after vaccination. Presence of immunity against wildtype and Delta variants in one-third of participants at baseline could be due to sub-clinical infections. Increase in humoral and cellular immunity was greater after mRNA as compared with inactivated vaccinations. As COVID-19 morbidity in the population remained low, our data supports effectiveness of multiple vaccine formulations in protecting against severe COVID-19 in this high transmission population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVaccine→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→