MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410594385 · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2025.111201

RFID adoption strategy and the operational performance of a pharmaceutical supply chain: The role of hospital competition

2025· article· en· W4410594385 on OpenAlexafffund
Cuihua Zhou, Rui Yang, Guoqing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Industrial Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersHumanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsSupply chainCompetition (biology)BusinessIndustrial organizationOperations managementSupply chain managementProcess managementMarketingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amid hospitals’ efforts to enhance operational efficiency and slash costs, addressing inventory inaccuracies in hospital pharmaceutical supply chain has gained urgency. Although radio frequency identification (RFID) technology effectively reduces such inaccuracies, its introduction in vendor-managed inventory (VMI) remains debatable for vendors given the impact of competitive inter-hospital environment and corresponding implementation costs. This study develops a three-level Stackelberg game model to analyze the vendor’s strategy regarding RFID adoption within the pharmaceutical supply chain, taking into account different types of competition between hospitals (i.e., public vs. public and public vs. private). We find that the vendor’s RFID adoption strategy under both forms of competition is counter-intuitive, with RFID being adopted even when the intensity of RFID in reducing inventory inaccuracy is low, provided the reimbursement rate for public hospital is high. Furthermore, homogeneous competition increases the vendor’s need for higher RFID intensity, while heterogeneous competition heightens the requirement for a favorable reimbursement rate. Finally, both homogeneous and heterogeneous competition can facilitate RFID adoption, with the preference depending on diagnosis cost, reimbursement rate and RFID intensity. This study offers fresh perspectives on the intricacies of vendors’ decision-making processes for RFID adoption in healthcare, emphasizing the significance of competitive dynamics and strategic management of medical consumables. • We analyze how vendors strategize with RFID in various types of hospital competition. • The vendor’s RFID strategy is counter-intuitive under both types of competition. • both homogeneous and heterogeneous competition can promote the vendor to adopt RFID. • This paper studies competitive dynamics and strategic management of medical consumables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers & Industrial EngineeringSame topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207