MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410595632 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-02714-4

Generative adversarial DacFormer network for MRI brain tumor segmentation

2025· article· en· W4410595632 on OpenAlexaff
Muqing Zhang, Qiule Sun, Yutong Han, Mingli Zhang, Wei Wang, Jianxin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAdversarial systemComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligenceGenerative grammarGenerative adversarial networkMagnetic resonance imagingPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineDeep learningRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current brain tumor segmentation methods often utilize a U-Net architecture based on efficient convolutional neural networks. While effective, these architectures primarily model local dependencies, lacking the ability to capture global interactions like pure Transformer. However, using pure Transformer directly causes the network to lose local feature information. To address this limitation, we propose the Generative Adversarial Dilated Attention Convolutional Transformer(GDacFormer). GDacFormer enhances interactions between tumor regions while balancing global and local information through the integration of adversarial learning with an improved transformer module. Specifically, GDacFormer leverages a generative adversarial segmentation network to learn richer and more detailed features. It integrates a novel Transformer module, DacFormer, featuring multi-scale dilated attention and a next convolution block. This module, embedded within the generator, aggregates semantic multi-scale information, efficiently reduces the redundancy in the self-attention mechanism, and enhances local feature representations, thus refining the brain tumor segmentation results. GDacFormer achieves Dice values for whole tumor, core tumor, and enhancing tumor segmentation of 90.9%/90.8%/93.7%, 84.6%/85.7%/93.5%, and 77.9%/79.3%/86.3% on BraTS2019-2021 datasets. Extensive evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness and competitiveness of GDacFormer. The code for GDacFormer will be made publicly available at https://github.com/MuqinZ/GDacFormer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification→French-language works237,207→