MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410596001 · doi:10.1093/heapol/czaf028

Reducing extreme heat impacts on health in pregnant women and infants: a community based intervention in Kilifi, Kenya

2025· article· en· W4410596001 on OpenAlexaff
Adélaïde Lusambili, Fiona Scorgie, Martha Oguna, Matthew Chersich, Stanley Lüchters, Giorgia Gon, Véronique Filippi, Sari Kovats, Kevin McCawley, Jeremy Hess, Britt Nakstad

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Policy and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsTrinity CollegeCentre for International Governance Innovation
FundersNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaNatural Environment Research CouncilNational Commission for Science and TechnologyNorges ForskningsrådNational Science FoundationVetenskapsrådetLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
KeywordsBreastfeedingIntervention (counseling)Psychological interventionMedicineNursingCommunity healthEnvironmental healthPsychologyFamily medicinePublic healthPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High ambient temperatures affect maternal and newborn health outcomes and wellbeing. The Climate Heat and Maternal and Neonatal Health in Africa (CHAMNHA) consortium conducted formative qualitative research in rural Kilifi, Kenya, to examine perceptions of heat risks among women, household members, and community stakeholders. An intervention was co-designed together with community members. This paper presents the development, implementation, and evaluation of a behaviour-change intervention aimed at reducing the burden of heat on maternal and newborn health. The intervention used Digital Audio-Visual (DAV) storytelling (encompassing short videos and a set of photographs) and facilitated group discussions. Intervention groups included pregnant and postpartum women (n = 10), mothers-in-law (n = 10), male spouses (n = 10), and community influencers (n = 40). Researchers and local community health volunteers supported pregnant and postpartum women and their household networks weekly for 4 months. At month five, a structured interview, originally administered at baseline, was repeated to evaluate understandings of heat risks and changes in behaviour (reducing exposure to heat by changing daily schedules, reducing heavy workload, and increasing spousal support). Pregnant and postpartum women reported a better understanding of the effects of heat on their health and the newborn, including the importance of staying hydrated, breastfeeding frequently, and avoiding heavy clothing for newborns. They also reported an increase in mothers-in-law and male spouses assisting with household chores and disseminating heat-health messaging to families. However, women noted that male spouses who supported them with chores sometimes reported being stigmatized by their peers. Community approaches to support pregnant and postpartum women during heat periods are feasible, and key community influencers can be trained to include heat-health messaging in their daily routines. Additional research is needed to examine whether repeated training is required to ensure sustainability. Future heat interventions focusing on maternal and neonatal health should consider factors such as employment, age, and depth of support networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Policy and PlanningSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207