MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410600783 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.04.024

Treating juvenile dermatomyositis to target: Paediatric Rheumatology European Society/Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance-endorsed recommendations from an international task force

2025· article· en· W4410600783 on OpenAlexaff
Angelo Ravelli, Silvia Rosina, Jayne MacMahon, Ana Rebollo-Giménez, Claas Hinze, Liza McCann, Ann M. Reed, Lisa G. Rider, Brigitte Bader‐Meunier, Claudio Bruno, Caifeng Li, Raquel Campanilho‐Marques, Chiara Fiorillo, Adam M. Huber, Marc H.A. Jansen, Özgür Kasapçopur, María Martha Katsicas, Susan Kim, Polly Livermore, Sue Maillard, Clara Malattia, Angela Migowa, Takako Miyamae, Ruth Murphy, Rebecca Nicolai, Charalampia Papadopoulou, Clarissa Pilkington, Helga Sanner, Sujata Sawhney, Elżbieta Smolewska, Stacey E. Tarvin, Georgina Tiller, Nataša Toplak, Lucy R. Wedderburn, Francesca Bovis, Alessandro Consolaro, Brian M. Feldman

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationDalhousie UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institutes of HealthRegione LiguriaMinistero della SaluteNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineJuvenile dermatomyositisRheumatologyTask forceInternal medicineArthritisPhysical therapyJuvenileDermatomyositisFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.036
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0360.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0150.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Myopathies and DermatomyositisFrench-language works237,207