MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410605511 · doi:10.1177/15589447251339506

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Using the Anterior Interosseous Nerve for Symptomatic Wrist Level Neuromas

2025· article· en· W4410605511 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHand · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuromaReinnervationWristSurgeryPosterior interosseous nerveMedian nerveRadial nerveSensory nerveWrist painOrthopedic surgeryCarpal tunnel syndromeAnatomySensory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic and traumatic sensory nerve injury at the level of the wrist can lead to debilitating neuroma. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective treatment for the management of symptomatic neuromas. We investigate the use of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) as a recipient nerve for the treatment of iatrogenic neuromas. This case series describes 4 patients treated for neuromas of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABC), palmar cutaneous branch of median nerve (PCB), and radial sensory nerve (RSN). METHODS: Four cases involved a symptomatic neuroma of the LABC, PCB, or RSN. These were treated with TMR, using the AIN motor branch to pronator quadratus. The neuromas were identified in all 4 cases and transected distally. The AIN was identified through a proximal extension of the exploratory incision and an end-to-end coaptation was performed to the proximal aspect of the donor nerve and the distal AIN. RESULTS: All 4 patients underwent routine follow-up for a duration of 2 to 10 months, with a long-term follow-up from 25 to 49 months. At routine follow-up, all patients reported resolution of pain and symptoms and had a negative Tinel's sign over their previous neuroma site. At the long-term follow-up, 2 patients reported recurrence of hyperesthesia, both to a lesser severity than before treatment. All 4 patients reported returning to work or routine and stated the TMR procedure improved their pain and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The motor branch of the distal AIN to pronator quadratus is a viable option as a TMR recipient for the management of symptomatic neuromas of the wrist level. Long-term follow-up shows reduction of reported pain and improvement of function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it