MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410608423 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1575135

Distinct proteomic signatures in Ethiopians predict acute and long-term sequelae of COVID-19

2025· article· en· W4410608423 on OpenAlexafffund
Dawit Wolday, Abrha Gebreselema Gebrehiwot, An Nguyen Le Minh, Muhammed Ahmed Rameto, Saro Abdella Abrahim, Atsbeha Gebreegziabxier, Wondwossen Amogne, Tobias F. Rinke de Wit, Meaza Hailu, Getachew Tollera, Geremew Tasew, Masresha Tessema, Matthew Miller, Amy Gillgrass, Dawn M. E. Bowdish, Charu Kaushic, Chris P. Verschoor

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster UniversityHealth Sciences NorthMcMaster University Medical Centre
FundersBundesministerium für GesundheitMcMaster University
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakTerm (time)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)MedicineVirologyIntensive care medicineComputational biologyBiologyInternal medicineDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)PhysicsOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Little is known about the acute and long-term sequelae of COVID-19 and its pathophysiology in African patients, who are known to have a distinct immunological profile compared to Caucasian populations. Here, we established protein signatures to define severe outcomes of acute COVID-19 and determined whether unique protein signatures during the first week of acute illness predict the risk of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (Long COVID) in a low-income country (LIC) setting. Method: Using the Olink inflammatory panel, we measured the abundance of 92 proteins in the plasma of COVID-19 patients (n=55) and non-COVID-19 individuals (n=23). We investigated distinct inflammatory protein signatures in acute severe COVID-19 individuals (n=22) compared to asymptomatic or mild/moderate COVID-19 cases (n=33), and non-COVID-19 controls. Results: Levels of SLAMF1, CCL25, IL2RB, IL10RA, IL15RA, IL18 and CST5 were significantly upregulated in patients with critical COVID-19 illness compared to individuals negative for COVID-19. The cohort was followed for an average of 20 months, and 23 individuals developed Long COVID, based on the WHO's case definition, while 32 COVID-19 patients recovered fully. Whereas upregulated levels of SLAMF1, TNF, TSLP, IL15RA, IL18, ADA, CXCL9, CXCL10, IL17C, and NT3 at the acute phase of the illness were associated with increased Long COVID risk, upregulated TRANCE was associated with a reduced risk of developing Long COVID. Protein levels of SLAMF1, IL15RA, and IL18 associated with critical illness during the acute phase of COVID-19 also predicted Long COVID risk. Discussion: Patients with severe COVID-19 and Long COVID outcomes exhibited distinct proteomic signatures. Unravelling the pathophysiology of severe acute COVID-19 and Long COVID before its advent may contribute to designing novel interventions for diagnosing, treating, and monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its associated acute and long-term consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207