MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410608429 · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-12852-0

Using interpretable survival analysis to assess hospital length of stay

2025· article· en· W4410608429 on OpenAlexafffund
Yan Li, Trevor J. Hall, Fahad Razak, Amol A. Verma, Mark Chignell, Lu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Health Services Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalCARE CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHealth administrationMedicineHealth informaticsNursing researchMetric (unit)Quality (philosophy)Duration (music)Health careEvent (particle physics)Operations managementPublic healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate in-hospital length of stay prediction is a vital quality metric for hospital leaders and health policy decision-makers. It assists with decision-making and informs hospital operations involving factors such as patient flow, elective cases, and human resources allocation, while also informing quality of care and risk considerations. The aim of the research reported in this paper is to use survival analysis to model General Internal Medicine (GIM) length of stay, and to use Shapley value to support interpretation of the resulting model. Survival analysis aims to predict the time until a specific event occurs. In our study, we predict the duration from patient admission to discharge to home, i.e., in-hospital length of stay. In addition to discussing the modeling results, we also talk about how survival analysis of hospital length of stay can be used to guide improvements in the efficiency of hospital operations and support the development of quality metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.254
GPT teacher head0.599
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Health Services ResearchSame topicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationFrench-language works237,207