MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410608924 · doi:10.1002/sim.70064

Dynamic Single‐Index Scalar‐On‐Function Model

2025· article· en· W4410608924 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yiwei Li, Akhgar Ghassabian, Leonardo Trasande, Mengling Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics in Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institutes of HealthYork University
KeywordsEstimatorBivariate analysisUnivariateSpline (mechanical)Parametric statisticsApplied mathematicsScalar (mathematics)Nonparametric statisticsComputer scienceModel selectionGeneralized additive modelParametric modelTensor productEconometricsMathematicsStatisticsMathematical optimizationMultivariate statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental exposures often exhibit temporal variability, prompting extensive research to understand their dynamic impacts on human health. There has been a growing interest in studying time-dependent exposure mixtures beyond a single exposure. However, current analytic methods typically assess each exposure individually or assume an additive relationship. This paper aims to fill the gap in method development for evaluating the joint effects of multiple time-dependent exposures on a scalar outcome. We introduce a dynamic single-index scalar-on-function model to characterize the exposure mixture's time-varying effect through a non-parametric bivariate exposure-time-outcome surface function. Utilizing B-spline tensor product bases to approximate the surface function, we propose a profiling algorithm for model estimation and establish large-sample properties for the resulting single-index estimators. In addition, we introduce a non-parametric hypothesis testing procedure to determine whether the surface function varies over time at each fixed mixture level and a model averaging solution to circumvent the issue of knot selection for spline approximations. The performance of our proposed methods is examined through extensive simulations and further illustrated using real-world applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics in MedicineSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207