MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410609283 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318118

Scavenger receptor class B type I knockout mice develop extensive diet-induced coronary artery atherosclerosis in an age-dependent manner

2025· article· en· W4410609283 on OpenAlexafffund
Samuel K. Lee, Ting Xiong, Alexander S. Qian, Jeong‐Ah Yoo, Bibi S.H. Sokeechand, Mark Fuller, Peter L. Gross, Richard C. Austin, Suleiman A. Igdoura, Bernardo L. Trigatti

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster UniversityThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAortic sinusMedicineKnockout mouseInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseCardiologyCoronary atherosclerosisFibrosisApolipoprotein BArteryScavenger receptorMyocardial fibrosisEndocrinologyCoronary arteriesCholesterolApolipoprotein ELipoproteinReceptorDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Homozygous knockout of scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-B1) in mice with atherogenic mutations (such as knockout of the apolipoprotein E or low density lipoprotein receptor genes) results in spontaneous or diet-induced coronary heart disease characterized by atherosclerosis development in the aortic sinus and coronary arteries, platelet accumulation in coronary artery plaques, myocardial fibrosis, and early death. However, the extent of coronary artery atherothrombosis and myocardial fibrosis in mice lacking SR-B1 alone (homozygous SR-B1 knockout mice) has not been examined. Although age is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease, few studies directly examine the effects of age on susceptibility to atherosclerosis or coronary artery atherothrombosis and myocardial fibrosis in mice. Therefore, we set out to examine the effects of age on diet-induced atherosclerosis in female homozygous SR-B1 knockout mice. APPROACH AND RESULTS: SR-B1 knockout mice exhibited little-to-no aortic sinus or coronary artery atherosclerosis at 52 weeks of age, when fed a normal diet. However when fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol, cholate-containing (HFCC) diet for 12 weeks from either 14 weeks of age (26-week-old at analysis) or 40 weeks of age (52-week-old at analysis), they developed similar degrees of atherosclerosis in their aortic sinuses. Interestingly, the older aged SR-B1 knockout mice exhibited increased coronary artery atherosclerosis, increased vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 levels and platelet accumulation in coronary arteries, and increased myocardial fibrosis and plasma levels of cardiac troponin I compared to the younger aged mice. Older-aged HFCC diet-fed SR-B1 knockout mice also exhibited reduced survival to humane endpoint. Moreover, older-aged HFCC diet-fed SR-B1 knockout mice exhibited a greater inflammatory state with increased levels of circulating interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor alpha, and neutrophils, despite plasma lipid levels being unchanged. Consistent with the increased circulating neutrophils, older-aged HFCC diet-fed SR-B1 knockout mice exhibited increased accumulation of the neutrophil marker myeloperoxidase and increased neutrophil extracellular traps in atherosclerotic plaques in the aortic sinus and increased abundance of atherosclerotic coronary arteries containing neutrophil extracellular traps. CONCLUSIONS: HFCC diet-fed homozygous SR-B1 knockout mice develop occlusive coronary artery atherothrombosis and myocardial fibrosis in an age-dependent manner, and exhibit an increased inflammatory state with older age. Therefore, aged SR-B1 knockout mice may prove to be an attractive mouse model to analyze age-dependent mechanisms associated with coronary artery disease development, which may facilitate the discovery of more effective therapeutics to treat cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins→French-language works237,207→