MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410611436 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105110

Efficacy and safety of larotrectinib as first-line treatment for patients with TRK fusion cancer

2025· article· en· W4410611436 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsBayer (Canada)
FundersNational Cancer InstituteLoxo OncologyBayer HealthCareBayer CorporationBayer
KeywordsTrk receptorCancerLine (geometry)FusionMedicineInternal medicineNeurotrophin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Larotrectinib is a first-in-class, highly selective tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor approved for tumour-agnostic use in patients with TRK fusion cancer. Data on treatment-naïve adult and paediatric patients or the subset of treatment-naïve paediatric patients who discontinued larotrectinib after surgery or achieving durable clinical benefit are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with treatment-naïve (no prior systemic therapy) metastatic/unresectable TRK fusion cancer from three larotrectinib clinical trials [NCT02122913, NCT02637687 (SCOUT) and NCT02576431 (NAVIGATE)] were included. Responses were assessed by an independent review committee (RECIST v1.1). SCOUT-enrolled patients could electively discontinue larotrectinib after surgical resection of disease, or ongoing non-surgical complete/partial response (≥1 year) or stable disease (≥2 years) in a 'wait-and-see' approach. RESULTS: As of 20 July 2023, 101 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 37 years (range 0-90 years). There were 14 different tumour types; the most common were non-infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) soft tissue sarcoma (30%), IFS (18%), salivary gland carcinoma (18%) and thyroid carcinoma (17%). The overall response rate was 77% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68% to 85%]. Median duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival were 59 months [95% CI 33 months-not estimable (NE)], 61 months (95% CI 33 months-NE) and not reached, respectively. Twenty-five of 42 SCOUT-enrolled patients entered a 'wait-and-see' period; at the data cut-off time, the 'wait-and-see' period was ongoing in 12 of these patients. Seven of 13 patients who exited the first 'wait-and-see' period had progressive disease and resumed larotrectinib; five of these seven patients had a response to re-treatment. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1/2. CONCLUSIONS: Larotrectinib achieved extremely durable responses, extended survival and had a favourable safety profile in treatment-naïve patients with TRK fusion cancers, supporting its use in this population. Elective discontinuation of larotrectinib may be feasible in selected paediatric patients, with response achievable after restarting larotrectinib in cases of recurrent off-therapy disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it